Trainers, Television, and the Fight for Racing’s Soul

The Professional Racing Association’s (PRA) recent demand for a six-figure annual payment from media companies for live trainer interviews has ignited a contentious debate within British horse racing. The PRA has called for its members to boycott interviews starting this Saturday at Sandown unless their demands are met, highlighting deeper issues of recognition and compensation in the sport.

Peter Savill, former chair of the British Horseracing Board and current head of the PRA, stated, “The money would not go to trainers personally – absolutely not. It will be up to them to decide where it goes but there are plenty of areas within racing, such as benevolent causes and the Injured Jockeys Fund, that need funding.”

However, this stance has faced criticism from within the training community. Kim Bailey, a Gold Cup and Grand National-winning trainer, expressed his disapproval, writing on his blog, “We should be promoting our sport, not hindering it. Jockeys get paid for their interviews but that money goes to help fund/subsidise their insurance etc. Racing and trainers have many faults, but forgetting this idea of cash for talking, I feel we also are incredibly lax at appreciating those who help us by sponsoring racing.”

Similarly, Classic-winning trainer Hugo Palmer voiced his opposition, stating, “I think it’s mad. I think it’s absolutely mad. I think it’s a terrible idea.” He emphasized the value of media exposure, adding, “I think it’s free advertising. I think it’s a terrible idea to charge for it.”

These differing perspectives underscore a broader tension within the industry regarding the distribution of media rights income and prize money. While the PRA argues that trainers deserve compensation similar to jockeys, who have received collective fees for TV interviews since 2008 to support insurance schemes, others believe that the existing media exposure serves as invaluable promotion for trainers, especially those from smaller yards.

The National Trainers Federation (NTF), the official body for trainers, has distanced itself from the PRA’s proposed boycott, advocating for constructive dialogue instead. The NTF’s position is “not to seek direct payment for media interviews,” suggesting that stakeholders should “work together” to resolve the issue.

As the debate continues, the racing community must consider the potential consequences of such actions. Alienating media partners could diminish the sport’s visibility, especially at a time when horse racing faces stiff competition for public attention. Collaboration and open dialogue among all stakeholders are essential to ensure the sport’s future prosperity.

In the fight for racing’s soul, unity and mutual respect among trainers, media, and governing bodies will be crucial. The industry must balance the need for fair compensation with the recognition of the invaluable role that media exposure plays in promoting the sport.

Share

Trainers, Television, and the Fight for Racing’s Soul

Sign Up To Ireland’s First Ever Grassroots Equine Magazine!

Written by Grassroots Members for Grassroots Members!!

Your subscription is 100% Free for our first year, No credit card details required.